↓ Skip to main content

QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here?

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1039 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
750 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here?
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00214-006-0143-z
Authors

Hai Lin, Donald G. Truhlar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 750 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 3%
Brazil 7 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Czechia 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 689 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 249 33%
Researcher 136 18%
Student > Master 62 8%
Student > Bachelor 52 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 126 17%
Unknown 82 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 415 55%
Physics and Astronomy 63 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 4%
Engineering 25 3%
Other 85 11%
Unknown 105 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,320,351
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#169
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,616
of 67,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them