| Title |
How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Wilson, Robert Rush, Susan Hussey, Christine Puckering, Fiona Sim, Clare S Allely, Paul Doku, Alex McConnachie, Christopher Gillberg |
| Abstract |
Interventions to promote positive parenting are often reported to offer good outcomes for children but they can consume substantial resources and they require rigorous appraisal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 27% |
| Netherlands | 15 | 21% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 77% |
| Scientists | 11 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 18% |
| Researcher | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 83 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#467,603
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#357
of 4,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,487
of 202,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.