↓ Skip to main content

Practicing What We Teach in Teaching Systems Practice: The Action–Learning Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Practicing What We Teach in Teaching Systems Practice: The Action–Learning Cycle
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, December 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1013126311580
Authors

Bob Zimmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Computer Science 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,517,992
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#73
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,549
of 132,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them