↓ Skip to main content

Infliximab versus cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Colorectal Disease, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Infliximab versus cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00384-012-1602-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kah Hoong Chang, John P. Burke, J. Calvin Coffey

Abstract

Acute severe colitis affects 25 % of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Up to 30-40 % of these patients are resistant to intensive steroid therapy and therefore require rescue therapy to prevent emergent colectomy. Data comparing rescue therapy using infliximab and cyclosporine are limited and equivocal. This study evaluates the outcomes of UC patients receiving infliximab or cyclosporine as rescue therapy in acute severe steroid-refractory exacerbations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Other 7 9%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 58%
Computer Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,916,772
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#340
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,163
of 184,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.