| Title |
Dengue vector management using insecticide treated materials and targeted interventions on productive breeding-sites in Guatemala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nidia Rizzo, Rodrigo Gramajo, Maria Cabrera Escobar, Byron Arana, Axel Kroeger, Pablo Manrique-Saide, Max Petzold |
| Abstract |
In view of the epidemiological expansion of dengue worldwide and the availability of new tools and strategies particularly for controlling the primary dengue vector Aedes aegypti, an intervention study was set up to test the efficacy, cost and feasibility of a combined approach of insecticide treated materials (ITMs) alone and in combination with appropriate targeted interventions of the most productive vector breeding-sites. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 22% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,622,789
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,958
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,873
of 185,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#117
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.