↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal malignancy
Published in
European Radiology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00330-012-2397-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Soussan, Gaëtan Des Guetz, Vincent Barrau, Vanessa Aflalo-Hazan, Gabriel Pop, Ziad Mehanna, Edmond Rust, Thomas Aparicio, Richard Douard, Robert Benamouzig, Philippe Wind, Véronique Eder

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT and MR with diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) for diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastrointestinal malignancies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 23%
Other 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 61%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,286
of 4,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,150
of 155,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,094 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.