↓ Skip to main content

A method of processing experimental data on the parameters of physical processes in information-measurement systems based on Mivar logical nets

Overview of attention for article published in Measurement Techniques, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 244)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A method of processing experimental data on the parameters of physical processes in information-measurement systems based on Mivar logical nets
Published in
Measurement Techniques, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11018-010-9548-0
Authors

R. A. Sandu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,210
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Measurement Techniques
#45
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,322
of 99,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Measurement Techniques
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them