↓ Skip to main content

Experiences, opportunities and challenges of implementing task shifting in underserved remote settings: the case of Kongwa district, central Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Experiences, opportunities and challenges of implementing task shifting in underserved remote settings: the case of Kongwa district, central Tanzania
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-698x-12-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A Munga, Stella P Kilima, Prince Pius Mutalemwa, William J Kisoka, Mwelecele N Malecela

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 36%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,443,957
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,851
of 17,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,231
of 201,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#90
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.