| Title |
The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-012-2228-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jesse Alan Slade Shantz, Jeff R. S. Leiter, Tania Gottschalk, Peter Benjamin MacDonald |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify standard procedures for the validation of arthroscopic simulators and determine whether simulators improve the surgical skills of users. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 42% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,875,295
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,523
of 2,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,200
of 172,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#25
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.