↓ Skip to main content

Central nervous system demyelinating diseases and recombinant hepatitis B vaccination: a critical systematic review of scientific production

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Central nervous system demyelinating diseases and recombinant hepatitis B vaccination: a critical systematic review of scientific production
Published in
Journal of Neurology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6716-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. Martínez-Sernández, A. Figueiras

Abstract

The etiology of multiple sclerosis has not yet been fully described. A potential link between the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and an increased risk of onset or exacerbation of multiple sclerosis emerged in the mid-1990s, leading to several spontaneous reports and studies investigating this association. We conducted a critical systematic review aimed at assessing whether hepatitis B vaccination increases the risk of onset or relapse of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system demyelinating diseases. MEDLINE and EMBASE were used as data sources, and the search covered the period between 1981 and 2011. Twelve references met the inclusion criteria. No significant increased risk of onset or relapse of the diseases considered was associated with hepatitis B vaccination, except in one study. Most studies included in this review displayed methodological limitations and heterogeneity among them, which rendered it impossible to draw robust conclusions about the safety of hepatitis B vaccination in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis. Therefore, on the basis of current data there is no need to modify the vaccination recommendations; however, there is a need to improve the quality of observational studies with emphasis on certain considerations that are discussed in this review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#900,112
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#97
of 4,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,391
of 176,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.