You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic characteristics and clinical effect of the emergent SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage in London, UK: a whole-genome sequencing and hospital-based cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00170-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan Frampton, Tommy Rampling, Aidan Cross, Heather Bailey, Judith Heaney, Matthew Byott, Rebecca Scott, Rebecca Sconza, Joseph Price, Marios Margaritis, Malin Bergstrom, Moira J Spyer, Patricia B Miralhes, Paul Grant, Stuart Kirk, Chris Valerio, Zaheer Mangera, Thaventhran Prabhahar, Jeronimo Moreno-Cuesta, Nish Arulkumaran, Mervyn Singer, Gee Yen Shin, Emilie Sanchez, Stavroula M Paraskevopoulou, Deenan Pillay, Rachel A McKendry, Mariyam Mirfenderesky, Catherine F Houlihan, Eleni Nastouli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,643 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 249 | 7% |
| Germany | 200 | 5% |
| Japan | 172 | 5% |
| Spain | 137 | 4% |
| Canada | 99 | 3% |
| Mexico | 94 | 3% |
| Colombia | 83 | 2% |
| Poland | 81 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 65 | 2% |
| Other | 407 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2056 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3321 | 91% |
| Scientists | 167 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 108 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 47 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 393 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Unknown | 143 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 154 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4955. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#831
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#12
of 6,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64
of 459,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 91.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.