↓ Skip to main content

広田照幸著『大学論を組み替える──新たな議論のために』 (名古屋大学出版会、2019年)

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
広田照幸著『大学論を組み替える──新たな議論のために』 (名古屋大学出版会、2019年)
Published in
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, March 2021
DOI 10.20554/nihondaigakukyouikugakkai.57.0_53
Authors

間篠 剛留

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#30
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,500
of 451,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.