↓ Skip to main content

A pilot study of cardiac electrophysiology catheters to map and pace bladder electrical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Neurourology and Urodynamics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot study of cardiac electrophysiology catheters to map and pace bladder electrical activity
Published in
Neurourology and Urodynamics, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/nau.23087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert S. Kelley, Michael D. Vardy, Grant R. Simons, Henry Chen, Charles Ascher‐Walsh, Michael Brodman

Abstract

This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of using diagnostic cardiac electrophysiology catheters for recording intrinsic urinary bladder electrical activity and for electrical pacing capture of bladder tissue. During cystoscopy, a curved quadripolar catheter was introduced and contact was made with the right and left halves of the dome and trigone in adult female patients undergoing cystoscopy. Electrical activity was recorded, using a commercially available cardiac electrophysiologic recording system, before and during pacing at 0.5-3.0 Hz. Apparent spontaneous electrical depolarizations were detected in both the trigone and the dome. The amplitude of these depolarizations was in the microVolt range. During pacing, local electrical capture was noted in the trigone, but not in the dome. Spontaneous low-amplitude electrical activity was detected in the bladder through the use of commercially available cardiac electrophysiology equipment. While these low-level signals could represent noise, the voltage, and morphology resemble detrusor muscle action potentials previously seen in animal studies. Pacing induced local electrical capture in the trigone but not the dome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Engineering 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,147,353
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#1,380
of 2,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,726
of 374,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.