↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of assays for drug efficacy in a three-dimensional model of the lung

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of assays for drug efficacy in a three-dimensional model of the lung
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00432-016-2198-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia M. Huber, Arno Amann, Stefan Koeck, Edith Lorenz, Jens M. Kelm, Petra Obexer, Heinz Zwierzina, Gabriele Gamerith

Abstract

The focus of the outlined work is the establishment of a three-dimensional lung model for various drug-screening applications. The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line Colo699 was cultivated as monolayer (2D) on plates for 5 days or as microtissues (3D) using a hanging-drop system for 5 and 10 days. Cells and microtissues were treated with afatinib (10-80 µM), cisplatin (100-800 µM) or vinorelbine (25-200 µM) for 24 or 48 hours (h). Cell proliferation and viability were analysed by intra-cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and lactate dehydrogenase release (LDH) assays, annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining, and cell cycle determination. Microtissue morphology and size, as well as cell death were evaluated via phase contrast microscopy. Our results demonstrate the valid determination of viability and cell death using established assays in the 3D system for drug testing. The comparison of ATP, LDH and cytometry data showed moderate (0.40) to very strong (0.99) correlations. Thereby, we observed partially significant differences in drug efficacy between microtissues and 2D cultures dependent from the applied treatment and read-out method. Altogether, microtissues developed resistance to cisplatin and vinorelbine; but remained more vulnerable to afatinib. These findings were confirmed with microscopy. In summary, we established an NSCLC 3D test system with multiple assays compatible for drug-testing applications of substances with different mechanisms of action. In addition, our data support the usage of microtissues as more accurate tools for drug-efficacy testing with the possibility of long-term cultivation and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Engineering 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,508,795
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1,408
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,267
of 360,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.