↓ Skip to main content

Two-Year Outcomes of Vagal Nerve Blocking (vBloc) for the Treatment of Obesity in the ReCharge Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,690)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Two-Year Outcomes of Vagal Nerve Blocking (vBloc) for the Treatment of Obesity in the ReCharge Trial
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2325-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline M. Apovian, Sajani N. Shah, Bruce M. Wolfe, Sayeed Ikramuddin, Christopher J. Miller, Katherine S. Tweden, Charles J. Billington, Scott A. Shikora

Abstract

The ReCharge Trial demonstrated that a vagal blocking device (vBloc) is a safe and effective treatment for moderate to severe obesity. This report summarizes 24-month outcomes. Participants with body mass index (BMI) 40 to 45 kg/m(2), or 35 to 40 kg/m(2) with at least one comorbid condition were randomized to either vBloc therapy or sham intervention for 12 months. After 12 months, participants randomized to vBloc continued open-label vBloc therapy and are the focus of this report. Weight loss, adverse events, comorbid risk factors, and quality of life (QOL) will be assessed for 5 years. At 24 months, 123 (76 %) vBloc participants remained in the trial. Participants who presented at 24 months (n = 103) had a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of 21 % (8 % total weight loss [TWL]); 58 % of participants had ≥5 % TWL and 34 % had ≥10 % TWL. Among the subset of participants with abnormal preoperative values, significant improvements were observed in mean LDL (-16 mg/dL) and HDL cholesterol (+4 mg/dL), triglycerides (-46 mg/dL), HbA1c (-0.3 %), and systolic (-11 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressures (-10 mmHg). QOL measures were significantly improved. Heartburn/dyspepsia and implant site pain were the most frequently reported adverse events. The primary related serious adverse event rate was 4.3 %. vBloc therapy continues to result in medically meaningful weight loss with a favorable safety profile through 2 years. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01327976.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 16 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 88 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Engineering 13 6%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 105 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 533. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#45,781
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#913
of 367,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.