↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Exposure to Occupational Asthmagens During Pregnancy and Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Study to Explore Early Development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Maternal Exposure to Occupational Asthmagens During Pregnancy and Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Study to Explore Early Development
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2882-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison B. Singer, Gayle C. Windham, Lisa A. Croen, Julie L. Daniels, Brian K. Lee, Yinge Qian, Diana E. Schendel, M. Daniele Fallin, Igor Burstyn

Abstract

Maternal immune activity has been linked to children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We examined maternal occupational exposure to asthma-causing agents during pregnancy in relation to ASD risk. Our sample included 463 ASD cases and 710 general population controls from the Study to Explore Early Development whose mothers reported at least one job during pregnancy. Asthmagen exposure was estimated from a published job-exposure matrix. The adjusted odds ratio for ASD comparing asthmagen-exposed to unexposed was 1.39 (95 % CI 0.96-2.02). Maternal workplace asthmagen exposure was not associated with ASD risk in this study, but this result does not exclude some involvement of maternal exposure to asthma-causing agents in ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 20%
Psychology 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,584,639
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,490
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,485
of 372,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#17
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.