You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global carbon dioxide efflux from rivers enhanced by high nocturnal emissions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41561-021-00722-3 |
| Authors |
Lluís Gómez-Gener, Gerard Rocher-Ros, Tom Battin, Matthew J. Cohen, Higo J. Dalmagro, Kerry J. Dinsmore, Travis W. Drake, Clément Duvert, Alex Enrich-Prast, Åsa Horgby, Mark S. Johnson, Lily Kirk, Fausto Machado-Silva, Nicholas S. Marzolf, Mollie J. McDowell, William H. McDowell, Heli Miettinen, Anne K. Ojala, Hannes Peter, Jukka Pumpanen, Lishan Ran, Diego A. Riveros-Iregui, Isaac R. Santos, Johan Six, Emily H. Stanley, Marcus B. Wallin, Shane A. White, Ryan A. Sponseller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 55% |
| Scientists | 40 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#309,278
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#650
of 3,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,244
of 458,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#19
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.