↓ Skip to main content

Current Status and Perspectives of Mixed Tree Plantations:

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 115)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Status and Perspectives of Mixed Tree Plantations:
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, January 2012
DOI 10.4005/jjfs.94.196
Authors

Takuo Nagaike

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,122,502
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#21
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,474
of 253,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Forest Society
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.