| Title |
Affective Reactivity to Daily Stressors and Long-Term Risk of Reporting a Chronic Physical Health Condition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-012-9423-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer R. Piazza, Susan T. Charles, Martin J. Sliwinski, Jacqueline Mogle, David M. Almeida |
| Abstract |
Daily stressors, such as an argument with a spouse or an impending deadline, are associated with short-term changes in physical health symptoms. Whether these minor hassles have long-term physical health ramifications, however, is largely unknown. The current study examined whether exposure and reactivity to daily stressors is associated with long-term risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition. Participants (N = 435) from the National Study of Daily Experiences completed a series of daily diary interviews between 1995 and 1996 and again 10 years later. Greater affective (i.e., emotional) reactivity to daily stressors at time 1 was associated with an increased risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition at time 2. Results indicate that how people respond to the daily stressors in their lives is predictive of future chronic health conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Sweden | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 46% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#712,115
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#96
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,888
of 182,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.