↓ Skip to main content

Professional Identity Formation in Medical Education: The Convergence of Multiple Domains

Overview of attention for article published in HEC Forum, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Professional Identity Formation in Medical Education: The Convergence of Multiple Domains
Published in
HEC Forum, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10730-012-9197-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Holden, Era Buck, Mark Clark, Karen Szauter, Julie Trumble

Abstract

There has been increasing emphasis on professionalism in medical education over the past several decades, initially focusing on bioethical principles, communication skills, and behaviors of medical students and practitioners. Authors have begun to discuss professional identity formation (PIF), distinguishing it as the foundational process one experiences during the transformation from lay person to physician. This integrative developmental process involves the establishment of core values, moral principles, and self-awareness. The literature has approached PIF from various paradigms-professionalism, psychological ego development, social interactions, and various learning theories. Similarities have been identified between the formation process of clergy and that of physicians. PIF reflects a very complex process, or series of processes, best understood by applying aspects of overlapping domains: professionalism, psychosocial identity development, and formation. In this study, the authors review essential elements of these three domains, identify features relevant to medical PIF, and describe strategies reported in the medical education literature that may influence PIF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Lecturer 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 83 32%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 39%
Social Sciences 37 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 64 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,109,256
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from HEC Forum
#61
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,878
of 183,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEC Forum
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.