Title |
The muscle fiber type–fiber size paradox: hypertrophy or oxidative metabolism?
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-010-1545-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
T. van Wessel, A. de Haan, W. J. van der Laarse, R. T. Jaspers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
Scientists | 5 | 24% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Norway | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 471 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 88 | 18% |
Researcher | 74 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 26 | 5% |
Other | 105 | 21% |
Unknown | 80 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 122 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 3% |
Other | 50 | 10% |
Unknown | 100 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,174,138
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#707
of 4,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,670
of 106,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.