↓ Skip to main content

What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Conlon, Kent Hecker, Susan Sabatini

Abstract

Admission committees are responsible for creating fair, defensible, reliable, and valid processes that assess those attributes considered important for professional success. There is evidence for the continuing use of academic ability as a selection criterion for health professional schools; however, there is little evidence for the reliability and validity of measures currently in place to assess personal characteristics. The Ontario Veterinary College (OVC) initiated a review of its admissions criteria in order to implement an evidence-based method to determine which characteristics veterinary stakeholders consider important to assess for admission.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Psychology 8 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 17 26%