↓ Skip to main content

Malt-induced premature yeast flocculation: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Malt-induced premature yeast flocculation: current perspectives
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10295-012-1086-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Apostolos G Panteloglou, Katherine A Smart, David J Cook

Abstract

Premature yeast flocculation (PYF) is a sporadic problem for the malting and brewing industries which can have significant financial and logistical implications. The condition is characterised by abnormally heavy (and sometimes early) flocculation of yeast during brewery fermentations. The resulting low suspended yeast cell counts towards the end of the fermentation can result in flavour defects and incomplete attenuation (fermentation of sugars to alcohol). Despite several decades of research into the phenomenon, its precise nature and mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. In part this is because the term PYF has become a 'catch-all' syndrome which can have multiple origins. Furthermore, there are complex interactions in the malting and brewing processes which together mean that the PYF status of a malt sample is hard to predict at a generic level. Whether or not PYF is observed depends not only on barley quality, but on process factors in the maltings and to a substantial extent on the brewing yeast strain concerned. This article highlights the significance of PYF, and reviews current knowledge relating to the origins of this complex phenomenon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 22%
Student > Master 11 19%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Engineering 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1,299
of 1,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,342
of 179,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.