You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations between conspiracism and the rejection of scientific innovations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1177/09636625211007013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mathew D. Marques, John R. Kerr, Matt N. Williams, Mathew Ling, Jim McLennan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 21% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Estonia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#669,199
of 24,669,628 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#68
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,536
of 399,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,669,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.