↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Predictors of Outcomes in the Early Start Denver Model Delivered in a Group Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Predictors of Outcomes in the Early Start Denver Model Delivered in a Group Setting
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1705-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giacomo Vivanti, Cheryl Dissanayake, Cynthia Zierhut, Sally J. Rogers, Victorian ASELCC Team

Abstract

There is a paucity of studies that have looked at factors associated with responsiveness to interventions in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We investigated learning profiles associated with response to the early start Denver model delivered in a group setting. Our preliminary results from 21 preschool children with an ASD aged 2- to 5-years suggest that the children with more advanced skills in functional use of objects, goal understanding and imitation made the best developmental gains after 1 year of treatment. Cognitive abilities, social attention, intensity of the treatment and chronological age were not associated with treatment gains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 32%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 45 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,245,072
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,740
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,918
of 186,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#26
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.