↓ Skip to main content

Prayer Beliefs and Change in Life Satisfaction Over Time

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Prayer Beliefs and Change in Life Satisfaction Over Time
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10943-012-9638-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neal Krause, R. David Hayward

Abstract

A considerable number of studies have focused on the relationship between prayer, health, and well-being. But the influence of some types of prayer (e.g., petitionary prayer) has received more attention than others. The purpose of this study is to examine an overlooked aspect of prayer: trust-based prayer beliefs. People with this orientation believe that God knows that best way to answer a prayer and He selects the best time to provide an answer. Three main findings emerge from data that were provided by a nationwide longitudinal survey of older people reveals. First, the results reveal that Conservative Protestants are more likely to endorse trust-based prayer beliefs. Second, the findings suggest that these prayer beliefs tend to be reinforced through prayer groups and informal support from fellow church members. Third, the data indicate that stronger trust-based prayer beliefs are associated with a greater sense of life satisfaction over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 44%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,466,445
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#665
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,054
of 190,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.