↓ Skip to main content

Melioidosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Microbiology Reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
13 patents
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
643 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melioidosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management
Published in
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1128/cmr.18.2.383-416.2005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen C. Cheng, Bart J. Currie

Abstract

Melioidosis, caused by the gram-negative saprophyte Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a disease of public health importance in southeast Asia and northern Australia that is associated with high case-fatality rates in animals and humans. It has the potential for epidemic spread to areas where it is not endemic, and sporadic case reports elsewhere in the world suggest that as-yet-unrecognized foci of infection may exist. Environmental determinants of this infection, apart from a close association with rainfall, are yet to be elucidated. The sequencing of the genome of a strain of B. pseudomallei has recently been completed and will help in the further identification of virulence factors. The presence of specific risk factors for infection, such as diabetes, suggests that functional neutrophil defects are important in the pathogenesis of melioidosis; other studies have defined virulence factors (including a type III secretion system) that allow evasion of killing mechanisms by phagocytes. There is a possible role for cell-mediated immunity, but repeated environmental exposure does not elicit protective humoral or cellular immunity. A vaccine is under development, but economic constraints may make vaccination an unrealistic option for many regions of endemicity. Disease manifestations are protean, and no inexpensive, practical, and accurate rapid diagnostic tests are commercially available; diagnosis relies on culture of the organism. Despite the introduction of ceftazidime- and carbapenem-based intravenous treatments, melioidosis is still associated with a significant mortality attributable to severe sepsis and its complications. A long course of oral eradication therapy is required to prevent relapse. Studies exploring the role of preventative measures, earlier clinical identification, and better management of severe sepsis are required to reduce the burden of this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 643 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 <1%
Thailand 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 625 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 16%
Student > Bachelor 91 14%
Student > Master 81 13%
Researcher 62 10%
Other 48 7%
Other 106 16%
Unknown 152 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 167 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 44 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 2%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 160 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#775,912
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#148
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#914
of 72,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them