↓ Skip to main content

Managing for efficiency in health care: the case of Greek public hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Managing for efficiency in health care: the case of Greek public hospitals
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10198-012-0437-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Mitropoulos, Ioannis Mitropoulos, Aris Sissouras

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficiency of public hospitals with two alternative conceptual models. One model targets resource usage directly to assess production efficiency, while the other model incorporates financial results to assess economic efficiency. Performance analysis of these models was conducted in two stages. In stage one, we utilized data envelopment analysis to obtain the efficiency score of each hospital, while in stage two we took into account the influence of the operational environment on efficiency by regressing those scores on explanatory variables that concern the performance of hospital services. We applied these methods to evaluate 96 general hospitals in the Greek national health system. The results indicate that, although the average efficiency scores in both models have remained relatively stable compared to past assessments, internal changes in hospital performances do exist. This study provides a clear framework for policy implications to increase the overall efficiency of general hospitals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 29 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#560
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,674
of 202,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.