| Title |
Chest x-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: A retrospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1099 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen H Bradley, Bobby SK Bhartia, Matthew EJ Callister, William T Hamilton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding Hatton, Martyn PT Kennedy, Luke TA Mounce, Bethany Shinkins, Pete Wheatstone, Richard D Neal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 69% |
| Japan | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 25% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,332,649
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#625
of 4,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,625
of 441,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#16
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.