↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Cold Welding of the Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty Prosthesis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Cold Welding of the Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty Prosthesis
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert K Whittaker, Ahmed M Zaghloul, Harry S Hothi, Imran A Siddiqui, Gordon W Blunn, John A Skinner, Alister J Hart

Abstract

A head that is "clinically cold welded" to a stem is one of the commonest reasons for unplanned removal of the stem. It is not clear which hip designs are at greatest risk of clinical cold welding. This was a case-control study of consecutively received hip implant retrievals; we chose the design of hip that had the greatest number of truly cold-welded heads (n = 11). For our controls, we chose retrieved hips of the same design but without cold welding of the head (n = 35). We compared the clinical variables between these 2 groups using nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests to investigate the significance of differences between the cold-welded and non-cold-welded groups. The design that most commonly caused cold welding was a combination of a Ti stem and Ti taper: 11 out of 48 (23%) were truly cold welded. Comparison of the clinical data showed that no individual factor could be used to predict this preoperatively with none of the 4 predictors tested showing any significance: (1) time to revision (P = .687), (2) head size (P = .067), (3) patient age at primary (P = .380), and (4) gender (P = .054). We have shown that clinical cold welding is most prevalent in Ti-Ti combinations of the stem and taper; approximately 25% of cases received at our center were cold welded. Analysis of clinical variables showed that it is not possible to predict which will be cold welded preoperatively. Surgeons should be aware of this potential complication when revising a Ti-Ti stem/head junction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,092,197
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#2,896
of 4,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,876
of 371,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#33
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.