↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of lumbar facet syndrome treated with oral diclofenac or methylprednisolone facet injection: a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes of lumbar facet syndrome treated with oral diclofenac or methylprednisolone facet injection: a randomized trial
Published in
International Orthopaedics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00264-016-3154-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surachai Sae-Jung, Kitti Jirarattanaphochai

Abstract

This prospective randomized trial is to determine the effectiveness of treating lumbar facet syndrome with oral diclofenac, methylprednisolone facet joint injection or both. We enrolled lumbar facet syndrome patients treated at Srinagarind Hospital. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/day oral diclofenac, an 80 mg injection of methylprednisolone into each symptomatic facet joint, or both. Endpoints were the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) before treatment, and at four and 12 weeks after treatment. Of the 99 patients, the mean age was 46.4 years and 48 were men. The initial ODI (mean ± SD) for the diclofenac, methylprednisolone and combined treatment was 45.1 ± 9.3, 42.9 ± 15.6, and 42.2 ± 11.5, respectively. The respective four week ODI was 30.1 ± 8.1, 20.2 ± 8.0, and 15.1 ± 5.5. The 12-week ODI was 42.4 ± 9.0, 32.2 ± 15.6, and 26.2 ± 11.7. The initial VAS was 7.1 ± 1.2, 7.6 ± 1.1, and 7.3 ± 1.0. The four week VAS was 5.3 ± 1.4, 3.6 ± 0.7, and 3.3 ± 1.1. The 12-week VAS was 6.1 ± 1.1, 5.8 ± 1.4, and 5.1 ± 0.9. The four week ODI and VAS for the combined treatment and the methylprednisolone treatment were significantly less than the diclofenac alone. The combined treatment also showed better scores than the methylprednisolone injection. Within each treatment, the best treatment effect was found at four weeks after which the ODI and VAS gradually increased but were still less than the initial scores. The combined treatment was more effective in reducing lumbar facet pain and improving the functional index than either treatment alone. This approach should be the preferred treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,002
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#899
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,724
of 300,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.