↓ Skip to main content

清酒品評法の改善と清酒釀造の根本方針

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN, January 1920
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
清酒品評法の改善と清酒釀造の根本方針
Published in
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN, January 1920
DOI 10.6013/jbrewsocjapan1915.15.11_1
Authors

江田 鎌治郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,427,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#67
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101
of 2,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF BREWING,JAPAN
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them