You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emerging investigator series: municipal wastewater as a year-round point source of neonicotinoid insecticides that persist in an effluent-dominated stream
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1039/d1em00065a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle T Webb, Hui Zhi, Dana W Kolpin, Rebecca D Klaper, Luke R Iwanowicz, Gregory H LeFevre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,285,973
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#526
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,014
of 530,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#42
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.