↓ Skip to main content

The magnetite-based receptors in the beak of birds and their role in avian navigation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
The magnetite-based receptors in the beak of birds and their role in avian navigation
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00359-012-0769-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Wiltschko, W. Wiltschko

Abstract

Iron-rich structures have been described in the beak of homing pigeons, chickens and several species of migratory birds and interpreted as magnetoreceptors. Here, we will briefly review findings associated with these receptors that throw light on their nature, their function and their role in avian navigation. Electrophysiological recordings from the ophthalmic nerve, behavioral studies and a ZENK-study indicate that the trigeminal system, the nerves innervating the beak, mediate information on magnetic changes, with the electrophysiological study suggesting that these are changes in intensity. Behavioral studies support the involvement of magnetite and the trigeminal system in magnetoreception, but clearly show that the inclination compass normally used by birds represents a separate system. However, if this compass is disrupted by certain light conditions, migrating birds show 'fixed direction' responses to the magnetic field, which originate in the receptors in the beak. Together, these findings point out that there are magnetite-based magnetoreceptors located in the upper beak close to the skin. Their natural function appears to be recording magnetic intensity and thus providing one component of the multi-factorial 'navigational map' of birds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 162 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 42%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Chemistry 11 6%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,488,295
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#76
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,383
of 202,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.