↓ Skip to main content

Differences in substance use between sexual orientations in a multi-country sample: findings from the Global Drug Survey 2015.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in substance use between sexual orientations in a multi-country sample: findings from the Global Drug Survey 2015.
Published in
Journal of Public Health, August 2016
DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdw069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Demant, Leanne Hides, David J Kavanagh, Katherine M White, Adam R Winstock, Jason Ferris

Abstract

This study examines substance use disparities among homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual adolescents and young adults from nine countries. Data from 58 963 respondents (aged 16 and 35 years) to the 2015 'Global Drug Survey' were utilized. Rates of lifetime, last-year, last-month use and age of onset of 13 different substances were compared across sexual identity subgroups. Adolescents and young adults with a sexual minority identity generally reported higher rates of substance use and an earlier age of onset compared to their heterosexual counterparts. Differences in substance use were larger among female groups than male groups, and rates of substance use were generally higher among bisexuals than homosexuals of both genders. Higher rates of substance use in bisexuals compared with homosexuals among both genders and larger differences between female groups highlight the importance of differentiating between sexual minority identities in substance use research, and in designing substance misuse interventions for people with a sexual minority identity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,765,152
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health
#918
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,932
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.