↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

L’utilisation d’un bandage camoufle une lésion traumatique du bassin chez un homme de 29 ans

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
Title
L’utilisation d’un bandage camoufle une lésion traumatique du bassin chez un homme de 29 ans
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2021
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.201114-f
Pubmed ID
Authors

K T Matthew Seah, James W MacKay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,710,203
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,926
of 8,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,523
of 435,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#72
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.