↓ Skip to main content

Ziostation2による単純CTからの肺血管3D-CT作成法

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ziostation2による単純CTからの肺血管3D-CT作成法
Published in
The Journal of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, July 2019
DOI 10.2995/jacsurg.33.578
Authors

Ryutaro Hanawa, Takao Shigenobu, Atsushi Tajima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,035,511
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,074
of 349,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them