| Title |
Major Fallacies Surrounding Stone Artifacts and Assemblages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-016-9297-8 |
| Authors |
Harold L. Dibble, Simon J. Holdaway, Sam C. Lin, David R. Braun, Matthew J. Douglass, Radu Iovita, Shannon P. McPherron, Deborah I. Olszewski, Dennis Sandgathe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 197 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
| Researcher | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 89 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,066,015
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#80
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,102
of 369,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.