↓ Skip to main content

Variations in EGFR ctDNA Correlates to the Clinical Efficacy of Afatinib in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Variations in EGFR ctDNA Correlates to the Clinical Efficacy of Afatinib in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12253-016-0097-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinfeng He, Wei Tan, Xuelian Tang, Jingping Ma

Abstract

Monitoring of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients on afatinib after acquired resistance to 1(st) generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors is important. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers an attractive means other than conventional tissue biopsy to characterize real time dynamic changes of the disease. In our study, we aim to ascertain the clinical value for ctDNA monitoring of NSCLC patients with acquired resistance for afatinib treatment. 200 patients positive for the activating epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were recruited for the study. Baseline molecular profiling for L858R, Exon 19 deletion and T790M were performed. Thereafter, serial blood samples were taken and patients were assessed by overall survival (OS) to determine the usefulness of ctDNA monitoring. At baseline, matched tumor biopsy and ctDNA analysis had a concordance agreement of 93.5% for L858R and exon 19 deletion. We also determined that a large proportion of patients had the drug resistance mutation T790M prior to starting afatinib and these patients were linked to a worse survival outcome. For patients that registered a drop in ctDNA levels after afatinib was administered, we observed that their survival outcome was more favorable (hazard ratio 1.56, (95% CI 1.04 to 2.43). ctDNA levels were mostly elevated after the 3(rd) sampling cycle. Our results suggest that ctDNA can be used to predict the clinical benefits of afatinib treatment. Pre and post blood sampling aids to identify patient groups that may benefit most from the treatment and ctDNA is relatively sensitive to address the dynamic changes of the disease at the molecular level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,467,278
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#379
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,720
of 355,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.