↓ Skip to main content

Heuristics, biases, and the regulation of risk

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Heuristics, biases, and the regulation of risk
Published in
Policy Sciences, March 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1004340726008
Authors

M. V. Rajeev Gowda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 61 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 21%
Psychology 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#283
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,698
of 35,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them