↓ Skip to main content

Electronic structure and chemical bonding of amorphous chromium carbide thin films

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic structure and chemical bonding of amorphous chromium carbide thin films
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, May 2012
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/24/22/225004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Magnuson, Matilda Andersson, Jun Lu, Lars Hultman, Ulf Jansson

Abstract

The microstructure, electronic structure and chemical bonding of chromium carbide thin films with different carbon contents have been investigated with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, electron energy loss spectroscopy and soft x-ray absorption-emission spectroscopies. Most of the films can be described as amorphous nanocomposites with non-crystalline CrC(x) in an amorphous carbon matrix. At high carbon contents, graphene-like structures are formed in the amorphous carbon matrix. At 47 at.% carbon content, randomly oriented nanocrystallites are formed creating a complex microstructure of three components. The soft x-ray absorption-emission study shows additional peak structures exhibiting non-octahedral coordination and bonding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 8 23%
Physics and Astronomy 5 14%
Chemistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,055,430
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#54
of 6,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,082
of 175,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.