↓ Skip to main content

A Conceptualization of the Utility of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Clinical Trials of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 1,643)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
A Conceptualization of the Utility of Subjective Cognitive Decline in Clinical Trials of Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12031-016-0810-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel F. Buckley, Victor L. Villemagne, Colin L. Masters, Kathryn A. Ellis, Christopher C. Rowe, Keith Johnson, Reisa Sperling, Rebecca Amariglio

Abstract

This commentary outlines a conceptual model for subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in relation to Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in the preclinical stages of disease and a framework for effectively utilizing SCD in secondary prevention clinical trials. Mounting evidence supports the notion that SCD is sensitive to encroaching Aβ-amyloid and neurodegeneration. SCD has also been shown to provide additive information of AD-dementia risk beyond what is known about the biomarker status of the individual. Thus, we provide recommendations for the implementing SCD measurement in clinical trials. We argue that SCD can be measured at three catch points within the course of the clinical trial: firstly, at the initial recruitment and screening phase; secondly, to create more robust estimates of rates of AD-dementia progression; and finally, to measure subjective experiences of cognitive change and quality of life over the course of the trial as a proxy of clinically meaningful functional improvement. We provide recommendations of how SCD can be approached at each of these points. SCD is an important component of the preclinical AD-dementia trajectory. Future studies need to elucidate the interactive influence of Aβ-amyloid and tau on SCD from a spatiotemporal perspective. Even as this evidence accrues, it is clear that SCD can provide unique and additive information about rates of progression and subjectively experienced cognitive change within clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 22%
Neuroscience 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 41 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,760,428
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#50
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,364
of 369,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.