Title |
Mentoring the Mentors of Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Minorities Who are Conducting HIV Research: Beyond Cultural Competency
|
---|---|
Published in |
AIDS and Behavior, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10461-016-1491-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karina L. Walters, Jane M. Simoni, Teresa (Tessa) Evans-Campbell, Wadiya Udell, Michelle Johnson-Jennings, Cynthia R. Pearson, Meg M. MacDonald, Bonnie Duran |
Abstract |
The majority of literature on mentoring focuses on mentee training needs, with significantly less guidance for the mentors. Moreover, many mentoring the mentor models assume generic (i.e. White) mentees with little attention to the concerns of underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (UREM). This has led to calls for increased attention to diversity in research training programs, especially in the field of HIV where racial/ethnic disparities are striking. Diversity training tends to address the mentees' cultural competency in conducting research with diverse populations, and often neglects the training needs of mentors in working with diverse mentees. In this article, we critique the framing of diversity as the problem (rather than the lack of mentor consciousness and skills), highlight the need to extend mentor training beyond aspirations of cultural competency toward cultural humility and cultural safety, and consider challenges to effective mentoring of UREM, both for White and UREM mentors. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 21% |
Psychology | 11 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 30% |