↓ Skip to main content

Viability and thresholds for treatment of extremely preterm infants: survey of UK neonatal professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viability and thresholds for treatment of extremely preterm infants: survey of UK neonatal professionals
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2021
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia Mietta Di Stefano, Katherine Wood, Helen Mactier, Sarah Elizabeth Bates, Dominic Wilkinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 8%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 31 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 33 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,188,539
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#103
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,695
of 456,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.