↓ Skip to main content

Natural disasters, climate change and mental health considerations for rural Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Rural Health, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural disasters, climate change and mental health considerations for rural Australia
Published in
Australian Journal of Rural Health, April 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00865.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirley A. Morrissey, Joseph P. Reser

Abstract

This paper addresses a very salient feature of rural life and landscapes in Australia, natural disasters, and offers a psychological perspective on individual and community perceptions, responses, preparedness and planning. The convergent perspective offered reflects research and practice findings and insights from social and environmental psychology, as well as clinical, health and community psychology. The objective is to briefly characterise how these psychological approaches frame the psychological and social reality of these threats and events, and to canvas what insights and evidence-based best practice psychology have to offer allied professionals and paraprofessionals, and rural communities, as they experience and come to terms with the vagaries and extremes of the Australian environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 26 10%
Other 21 8%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 17%
Social Sciences 42 16%
Environmental Science 29 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 63 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,211,314
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#149
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,333
of 87,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.