You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineering molecular chains in carbon nanotubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nanoscale, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c2nr32571c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas W. Chamberlain, Rudolf Pfeiffer, Jonathan Howells, Herwig Peterlik, Hans Kuzmany, Bernhard Kräutler, Tatiana Da Ros, Manuel Melle-Franco, Francesco Zerbetto, Dragana Milić, Andrei N. Khlobystov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 44% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,850,366
of 23,804,991 outputs
Outputs from Nanoscale
#2,566
of 9,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,625
of 248,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanoscale
#110
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.