Title |
Effects of isometric squat training on the tendon stiffness and jump performance
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00421-005-0087-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Keitaro Kubo, Hideaki Yata, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tetsuo Fukunaga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 273 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
Researcher | 21 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
Other | 59 | 21% |
Unknown | 61 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 128 | 45% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 11% |
Engineering | 13 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 6% |
Unknown | 73 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,148,985
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#3,667
of 4,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,861
of 159,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.