You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Home Versus Clinic-Based Management of Chronic Heart Failure The WHICH? (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) Multicenter, Randomized Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.025 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Stewart, Melinda J. Carrington, Thomas H. Marwick, Patricia M. Davidson, Peter Macdonald, John D. Horowitz, Henry Krum, Phillip J. Newton, Christopher Reid, Yih Kai Chan, Paul A. Scuffham |
Abstract |
The goal of this study was to make a head-to-head comparison of 2 common forms of multidisciplinary chronic heart failure (CHF) management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,802,851
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#5,455
of 17,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,632
of 195,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#35
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.