↓ Skip to main content

Value of information and monitoring in conservation biology

Overview of attention for article published in Environment Systems and Decisions, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Value of information and monitoring in conservation biology
Published in
Environment Systems and Decisions, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10669-016-9603-8
Authors

Mark Colyvan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#263
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,168
of 377,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.