You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Informetrics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xianwen Wang, Shenmeng Xu, Lian Peng, Zhi Wang, Chuanli Wang, Chunbo Zhang, Xianbing Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 13% |
| Spain | 14 | 9% |
| Japan | 7 | 5% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 58% |
| Scientists | 56 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| China | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 177 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 27% |
| Researcher | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 27% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#228,407
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Informetrics
#8
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,124
of 191,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Informetrics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.